On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:27:49PM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:00:39AM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >> From the code flow, the 'max' checks are already being done on the prz
> >> passed to ramoops_get
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:00:39AM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>> From the code flow, the 'max' checks are already being done on the prz
>> passed to ramoops_get_next_prz. Lets remove it to simplify this function
>> and reduce its
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
wrote:
> From the code flow, the 'max' checks are already being done on the prz
> passed to ramoops_get_next_prz. Lets remove it to simplify this function
> and reduce its arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
> ---
> fs/ps
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:00:39AM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> From the code flow, the 'max' checks are already being done on the prz
> passed to ramoops_get_next_prz. Lets remove it to simplify this function
> and reduce its arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
> ---
>From the code flow, the 'max' checks are already being done on the prz
passed to ramoops_get_next_prz. Lets remove it to simplify this function
and reduce its arguments.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
fs/pstore/ram.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(
5 matches
Mail list logo