On 31/05/16 15:03, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 02:49 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>> On 05/29/2016 10:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 23/05/16 19:40, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
The trigger name is documented as unique but drivers are currently
allowed to register tri
On 05/30/2016 02:49 PM, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> On 05/29/2016 10:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 23/05/16 19:40, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>>> The trigger name is documented as unique but drivers are currently
>>> allowed to register triggers with duplicate names. This should be
>>> cons
On 05/29/2016 10:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 23/05/16 19:40, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>> The trigger name is documented as unique but drivers are currently
>> allowed to register triggers with duplicate names. This should be
>> considered a bug since it makes the 'current_trigger' interfa
On 23/05/16 19:40, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> The trigger name is documented as unique but drivers are currently
> allowed to register triggers with duplicate names. This should be
> considered a bug since it makes the 'current_trigger' interface
> unusable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Crestez Dan Leonar
The trigger name is documented as unique but drivers are currently
allowed to register triggers with duplicate names. This should be
considered a bug since it makes the 'current_trigger' interface
unusable.
Signed-off-by: Crestez Dan Leonard
---
drivers/iio/industrialio-trigger.c | 21 ++
5 matches
Mail list logo