On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 07:00 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 07:50:31AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 06:13 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> >
> > > Spitting does feel brutal...
> >
> > FWIW, "split" stuck hard in my gullet because task placement is core
>
> O
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 07:50:31AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 06:13 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
>
> > Spitting does feel brutal...
>
> FWIW, "split" stuck hard in my gullet because task placement is core
Oh, sorry for that, :)
> fastpath mission. If the fastpath could aff
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 06:13 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> Spitting does feel brutal...
FWIW, "split" stuck hard in my gullet because task placement is core
fastpath mission. If the fastpath could afford to and did task
placement perfectly, task placement EDC (if you will) mechanisms would
not exist.
Hi,
I should have changed the subject to "Refining the load balancing interfaces".
Spitting does feel brutal or too big a jump for now. But i doubt that would
change your mind anyway.
Overall, I interpret your comment as: calling for substantial stuff. Yay,
working on it.
Thanks,
Yuyang
On Thu,
* Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:37 +0800, Yuyang du wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is continued after the first RFC about splitting the scheduler. Still
> > work-in-progress, and call for feedback.
> >
> > The question addressed here is how load balance should be changed.
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 02:37 +0800, Yuyang du wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is continued after the first RFC about splitting the scheduler. Still
> work-in-progress, and call for feedback.
>
> The question addressed here is how load balance should be changed. And I think
> the question then goes to h
Hi all,
This is continued after the first RFC about splitting the scheduler. Still
work-in-progress, and call for feedback.
The question addressed here is how load balance should be changed. And I think
the question then goes to how to *reuse* common code as much as possible and
meanwhile be able
7 matches
Mail list logo