Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" > and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). > Since this approach was approved, the number of

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" > and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). > Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has > increased

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi Vikas On 07/17/2017 10:42 PM, Vikas Manocha wrote: Hi Alex, On 07/17/2017 09:23 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: From: Alexandre TORGUE Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex:

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi Vikas On 07/17/2017 10:42 PM, Vikas Manocha wrote: Hi Alex, On 07/17/2017 09:23 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: From: Alexandre TORGUE Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi Alex, On 07/17/2017 09:23 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > From: Alexandre TORGUE > > Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" > and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). > Since this approach was

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi Alex, On 07/17/2017 09:23 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > From: Alexandre TORGUE > > Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" > and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). > Since this approach was approved, the number of

[RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new file

[RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

From: Alexandre TORGUE Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased

[RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new file

[RESEND RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

From: Alexandre TORGUE Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743).

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi On 07/17/2017 01:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: blabla Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE You may want to provide a little more detail here ;-) Oh!! Sorry, I changed it but no sent

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Hi On 07/17/2017 01:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: blabla Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE You may want to provide a little more detail here ;-) Oh!! Sorry, I changed it but no sent the good commit :). Please translate blablable by:

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > blabla > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE You may want to provide a little more detail here ;-) Arnd

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: > blabla > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE You may want to provide a little more detail here ;-) Arnd

[RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

blabla Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi index a8113dc..4bb2b4f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ #include

[RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

blabla Signed-off-by: Alexandre TORGUE diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi index a8113dc..4bb2b4f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ #include "skeleton.dtsi" #include

[RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new file

[RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: change pinctrl bindings definition

Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h" and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX). Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new file