On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:25:32AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug, at 09:34:10AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... That's a good point. It certainly would be nice for us to have
> > those mappings in the kexec kernel, at least for the time being. If
> > you're not opposed to
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:25:32AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug, at 09:34:10AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> >
> > Hmm... That's a good point. It certainly would be nice for us to have
> > those mappings in the kexec kernel, at least for the time being. If
> > you're not opposed to
On Mon, 01 Aug, at 09:34:10AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> Hmm... That's a good point. It certainly would be nice for us to have
> those mappings in the kexec kernel, at least for the time being. If
> you're not opposed to it, I can write up the patch. Pretty sure it's a
> one-liner.
If it's
On Mon, 01 Aug, at 09:34:10AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> Hmm... That's a good point. It certainly would be nice for us to have
> those mappings in the kexec kernel, at least for the time being. If
> you're not opposed to it, I can write up the patch. Pretty sure it's a
> one-liner.
If it's
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:39:26PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul, at 05:38:32PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> >
> > After investigating the problem here and figuring out the proper way to
> > get the noefi parameter working again, I noticed that there appears to
> > be support for EFI
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:39:26PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul, at 05:38:32PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> >
> > After investigating the problem here and figuring out the proper way to
> > get the noefi parameter working again, I noticed that there appears to
> > be support for EFI
On Tue, 26 Jul, at 05:38:32PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> After investigating the problem here and figuring out the proper way to
> get the noefi parameter working again, I noticed that there appears to
> be support for EFI runtime callbacks in a kexec'd kernel now... I
> think we need some more
On Tue, 26 Jul, at 05:38:32PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> After investigating the problem here and figuring out the proper way to
> get the noefi parameter working again, I noticed that there appears to
> be support for EFI runtime callbacks in a kexec'd kernel now... I
> think we need some more
Hey everyone,
This is a fix for our BIOS init code to skip mapping in runtime services
when runtime_disabled == true. This is one that snuck under the radar
for a while, since we were using EFI_OLD_MEMMAP for so long. I've
explained the details of how it went unnoticed in the commit message.
Hey everyone,
This is a fix for our BIOS init code to skip mapping in runtime services
when runtime_disabled == true. This is one that snuck under the radar
for a while, since we were using EFI_OLD_MEMMAP for so long. I've
explained the details of how it went unnoticed in the commit message.
10 matches
Mail list logo