On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:44 AM Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:43 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Mar 2021 17:13:32 +0800
> > Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 14:55 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:10:02 +0800
> >
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 13:43 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2021 17:13:32 +0800
> Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 14:55 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:10:02 +0800
> > > Ian Kent wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 13:11
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:31:05 +0300
Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:12:22 +
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:51:20PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:33PM +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > >
> > > > That problem connected
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:12:22 +
Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:51:20PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:33PM +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> >
> > > That problem connected with CRIU (Checkpoint-Restore in Userspace)
> > > project.
> > > In CRIU we
On Sat, 06 Mar 2021 17:13:32 +0800
Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 14:55 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:10:02 +0800
> > Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 13:11 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:54:11 +0800
>
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 12:12:22AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> Wait, so you have /proc overmounted, without anything autofs-related on
> /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc and still want to have the pathname resolved, just
> because it would've resolved with that overmount of /proc removed?
>
> I
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:51:20PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:33PM +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
>
> > That problem connected with CRIU (Checkpoint-Restore in Userspace) project.
> > In CRIU we have support of autofs mounts C/R. To acheive that we need to use
> >
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:11:33PM +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> That problem connected with CRIU (Checkpoint-Restore in Userspace) project.
> In CRIU we have support of autofs mounts C/R. To acheive that we need to use
> ioctl's from /dev/autofs to get data about mounts, restore mount as
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 14:55 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:10:02 +0800
> Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 13:11 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:54:11 +0800
> > > Ian Kent wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 18:28
On Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:10:02 +0800
Ian Kent wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 13:11 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:54:11 +0800
> > Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 18:28 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > > It was discovered that
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 13:11 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:54:11 +0800
> Ian Kent wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 18:28 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > It was discovered that find_autofs_mount() function
> > > in autofs not support cases when autofs
On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:54:11 +0800
Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 18:28 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > It was discovered that find_autofs_mount() function
> > in autofs not support cases when autofs mount
> > parent is overmounted. In this case this function will
> > always
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 18:28 +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> It was discovered that find_autofs_mount() function
> in autofs not support cases when autofs mount
> parent is overmounted. In this case this function will
> always return -ENOENT.
Ok, I get this shouldn't happen.
>
> Real-life
It was discovered that find_autofs_mount() function
in autofs not support cases when autofs mount
parent is overmounted. In this case this function will
always return -ENOENT.
Real-life reproducer is fairly simple.
Consider the following mounts on root mntns:
--
35 24 0:36 /
It was discovered that find_autofs_mount() function
in autofs not support cases when autofs mount
parent is overmounted. In this case this function will
always return -ENOENT.
Real-life reproducer is fairly simple.
Consider the following mounts on root mntns:
--
35 24 0:36 /
15 matches
Mail list logo