On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:51:21 -0700
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:35:51PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > Is it possible to use "from_nid = cpu->node_id"?
> >
> > Background:
> >
> > I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390. At
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:51:21 -0700
Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:35:51PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
Hello Greg,
Is it possible to use from_nid = cpu-node_id?
Background:
I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:35:51PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> Is it possible to use "from_nid = cpu->node_id"?
>
> Background:
>
> I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390. At startup, for
> "deconfigured" CPUs, we don't know to which nodes the CPUs belong.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:35:51PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
Hello Greg,
Is it possible to use from_nid = cpu-node_id?
Background:
I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390. At startup, for
deconfigured CPUs, we don't know to which nodes the CPUs belong. Therefore
we
Hello Greg,
Is it possible to use "from_nid = cpu->node_id"?
Background:
I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390. At startup, for
"deconfigured" CPUs, we don't know to which nodes the CPUs belong. Therefore
we always return node 0 for cpu_to_node().
For each present CPU the
Hello Greg,
Is it possible to use from_nid = cpu-node_id?
Background:
I am currently working on (fake) NUMA support for s390. At startup, for
deconfigured CPUs, we don't know to which nodes the CPUs belong. Therefore
we always return node 0 for cpu_to_node().
For each present CPU the
6 matches
Mail list logo