On 07/05/2016 08:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for
On 07/05/2016 08:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
- JC42.4 really
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
> sensor chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
> ---
> RFC to address:
> - Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
> - JC42.4 really specifies
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
> sensor chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
> ---
> RFC to address:
> - Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
> - JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
- JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor.
Is "jedec,jc42-4"
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
- JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor.
Is "jedec,jc42-4" appropriate, or should it
6 matches
Mail list logo