On 01/04/2013 11:01 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0800, Lin Feng wrote:
>> The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array
>> in
>> reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
>>
>> Tejun fix a underflow bug
On 01/04/2013 11:01 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0800, Lin Feng wrote:
The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array
in
reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
Tejun fix a underflow bug in
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0800, Lin Feng wrote:
> The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array in
> reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
>
> Tejun fix a underflow bug in 5d53cb27d8, but I think we could break there for
>
The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array in
reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
Tejun fix a underflow bug in 5d53cb27d8, but I think we could break there for
the same reason.
Cc: Tejun Heo
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng
---
The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array in
reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
Tejun fix a underflow bug in 5d53cb27d8, but I think we could break there for
the same reason.
Cc: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lin
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0800, Lin Feng wrote:
The memblock array is in ascending order and we traverse the memblock array in
reverse order so we can add some simple check to reduce the search work.
Tejun fix a underflow bug in 5d53cb27d8, but I think we could break there for
the
6 matches
Mail list logo