On 10 September 2015 at 10:43, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 09/09/15 13:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
>>> +
Hi Ulf,
On 09/09/15 13:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[snip]
>> +static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
>> + struct mmc_ioc_cmd __user *ic_ptr)
>> +{
>> + struct mmc_blk_ioc_data *idata;
>> + struct mmc_blk_data *md;
>> + struct mmc_card *card;
>>
Hi Ulf,
On 09/09/15 13:42, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 17:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Olof,
>>
>> On 02/09/15 19:28, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
From: Seshagiri Holi
Certain eMMC devices allow vendor spec
On 3 September 2015 at 17:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> On 02/09/15 19:28, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> From: Seshagiri Holi
>>>
>>> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
>>> via a sequence of v
On 04/09/15 02:14, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02/09/15 23:08, Grant Grundler wrote:
>>> [resending text-only]
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Grant Grundler
>> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Olof Johansson
[resending...keep forgetting to switch back to text-only in gmail]
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
...
>>> If alignment matters, then maybe swap the fields?
>>> Or declare num_of_cmds as u64 as well?
>
> Thanks. I did swap them in the updated version as this seems to make
> sens
On 02/09/15 23:08, Grant Grundler wrote:
> [resending text-only]
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> ...
+/**
+ * struct mmc_ioc_combo_cmd - combo command information
+ * @num_of_cmds: number
Hi Olof,
On 02/09/15 19:28, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> From: Seshagiri Holi
>>
>> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
>> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
>> in s
[resending text-only]
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> ...
>> > +/**
>> > + * struct mmc_ioc_combo_cmd - combo command information
>> > + * @num_of_cmds: number of commands to send
>> > + * @mmc_ioc_cmd_list: poi
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> From: Seshagiri Holi
>
> Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
> via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
> in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would b
From: Seshagiri Holi
Certain eMMC devices allow vendor specific device information to be read
via a sequence of vendor commands. These vendor commands must be issued
in sequence and an atomic fashion. One way to support this would be to
add an ioctl function for sending a sequence of commands to
11 matches
Mail list logo