On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:26:32 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Fontenot
> wrote:
> > struct rtas_error_log {
> > - unsigned long version:8;/* Architectural version */
> > - unsigned long severity:3; /* Severity
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:26:32 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Fontenot
nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
struct rtas_error_log {
- unsigned long version:8;/* Architectural version */
- unsigned long
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Fontenot
wrote:
> struct rtas_error_log {
> - unsigned long version:8;/* Architectural version */
> - unsigned long severity:3; /* Severity level of error */
> - unsigned long disposition:2;/*
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nathan Fontenot
nf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
struct rtas_error_log {
- unsigned long version:8;/* Architectural version */
- unsigned long severity:3; /* Severity level of error */
- unsigned long
This is the patch that I worked up at the same time as Greg, the
biggest difference being that I took the approach of doing and's,
and shifting as opposed to re-defining the bit fields for LE.
One other difference is that I left out defines for bits in the
error log structures that we currently
This is the patch that I worked up at the same time as Greg, the
biggest difference being that I took the approach of doing and's,
and shifting as opposed to re-defining the bit fields for LE.
One other difference is that I left out defines for bits in the
error log structures that we currently
6 matches
Mail list logo
