dhat.com]
> >>> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
> >>> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> >>> Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>> Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
> >>>
-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the dirrection
I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not sure if we want to
introduce a "v2" interface version with slightly diffe
t;> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> >> Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
> >> >
> >
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
To: Sethi
-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the dirrection
I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not sure if we want to
introduce a v2 interface version with slightly different unmap
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the dirrection
I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not sure if we want
ux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
>>
>> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
>> >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.willia
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: io
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:06 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PA
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:27 +, bharat.bhus...@freescale.com wrote:
> > + domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(domain->bus);
> > + if (!domain->domain) {
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + goto out_free;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:27 +, bharat.bhus...@freescale.com wrote:
+ domain-domain = iommu_domain_alloc(domain-bus);
+ if (!domain-domain) {
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
+
+ ret = iommu_attach_group(domain-domain, iommu_group);
+ if (ret)
+
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:06 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi
el@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
>
> RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the
> dirrection I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not
> sure if we want to introduce a "v2" interface versio
org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Alex Williamson
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:51 PM
> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IO
org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
> >
> > RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the dirrection
> > I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not sure if we want to
> > i
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IO
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC
PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the dirrection
I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not sure if we want to
introduce a v2 interface version with slightly different unmap
semantics. QEMU doesn't care
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 9:51 PM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:45 +, Varun Sethi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.william...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: io
Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the
dirrection I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not
sure if we want to introduce a v2 interface version with
slightly different unmap semantics. QEMU doesn't
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the
dirrection I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not
sure if we want to introduce a "v2" interface version with
slightly different unmap semantics. QEMU doesn't care about
the difference, but other users might. Be warned, I'm
RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the
dirrection I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not
sure if we want to introduce a v2 interface version with
slightly different unmap semantics. QEMU doesn't care about
the difference, but other users might. Be warned, I'm
24 matches
Mail list logo
