On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > That doesn't always prefer CMA region. It would be nice to
> > > understand why grouping in pageblock_nr_pages is beneficial. Also in
> > > your patch you decrement
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
That doesn't always prefer CMA region. It would be nice to
understand why grouping in pageblock_nr_pages is beneficial. Also in
your patch you decrement nr_try_cma for
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > That doesn't always prefer CMA region. It would be nice to
> > understand why grouping in pageblock_nr_pages is beneficial. Also in
> > your patch you decrement nr_try_cma for every 'order' allocation. Why ?
>
> pageblock_nr_pages
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:10:55AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
That doesn't always prefer CMA region. It would be nice to
understand why grouping in pageblock_nr_pages is beneficial. Also in
your patch you decrement nr_try_cma for every 'order' allocation. Why ?
pageblock_nr_pages is just
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:14:30PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> >This series tries to improve CMA.
> >> >
> >> >CMA is introduced to
Joonsoo Kim writes:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> >This series tries to improve CMA.
>> >
>> >CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
>> >without reserving memory area.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:14:30PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to
Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo@lge.com writes:
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >This series tries to improve CMA.
> >
> >CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
> >without reserving memory area. But, current implementation
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
Hello,
On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
reserving memory approach, because allocation on cma reserved region
Hello,
On 2014-05-08 02:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
reserving memory approach, because allocation on cma reserved region
Hello,
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
reserving memory approach, because allocation on cma reserved region only
occurs as fallback of migrate_movable
Hello,
This series tries to improve CMA.
CMA is introduced to provide physically contiguous pages at runtime
without reserving memory area. But, current implementation works like as
reserving memory approach, because allocation on cma reserved region only
occurs as fallback of migrate_movable
14 matches
Mail list logo
