On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:51:32 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > One of the building blocks for achieving this speedup is a cmpxchg
> > based Lock-Free queue that supports bulking, named alf_queue for
> > Array-based Lock-Free queue.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:51:32 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
One of the building blocks for achieving this speedup is a cmpxchg
based Lock-Free queue that supports bulking, named alf_queue for
Array-based Lock-Free
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> One of the building blocks for achieving this speedup is a cmpxchg
> based Lock-Free queue that supports bulking, named alf_queue for
> Array-based Lock-Free queue. By bulking elements (pointers) from the
> queue, the cost of the cmpxchg
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> That is very strange! I did notice that it was somehow delayed in
> showing up on gmane.org
> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/342347/focus=126148)
> and didn't show up on netdev either...
It finally got through.
--
To
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:32 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > Patch1: alf_queue (Lock-Free queue)
>
> For some reason that key patch is not in my linux-mm archives nor in my
> inbox.
That is very strange! I did notice that it was
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Patch1: alf_queue (Lock-Free queue)
For some reason that key patch is not in my linux-mm archives nor in my
inbox.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:22:22 +
David Laight wrote:
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
> > on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
> > packet size[1], requires handling a packet every 67.2 ns
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
> on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
> packet size[1], requires handling a packet every 67.2 ns (nanosec).
>
> Micro benchmarking[2] the SLUB allocator (with skb
The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
packet size[1], requires handling a packet every 67.2 ns (nanosec).
Micro benchmarking[2] the SLUB allocator (with skb size 256bytes
elements), show
The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
packet size[1], requires handling a packet every 67.2 ns (nanosec).
Micro benchmarking[2] the SLUB allocator (with skb size 256bytes
elements), show
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
packet size[1], requires handling a packet every 67.2 ns (nanosec).
Micro benchmarking[2] the SLUB allocator (with skb size
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:22:22 +
David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
The network stack have some use-cases that puts some extreme demands
on the memory allocator. One use-case, 10Gbit/s wirespeed at smallest
packet size[1], requires handling a packet
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Patch1: alf_queue (Lock-Free queue)
For some reason that key patch is not in my linux-mm archives nor in my
inbox.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:17:32 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
Patch1: alf_queue (Lock-Free queue)
For some reason that key patch is not in my linux-mm archives nor in my
inbox.
That is very strange! I did notice that
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
That is very strange! I did notice that it was somehow delayed in
showing up on gmane.org
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/342347/focus=126148)
and didn't show up on netdev either...
It finally got through.
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
One of the building blocks for achieving this speedup is a cmpxchg
based Lock-Free queue that supports bulking, named alf_queue for
Array-based Lock-Free queue. By bulking elements (pointers) from the
queue, the cost of the cmpxchg (approx 8
16 matches
Mail list logo
