Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm: unclutter THP migration

2017-12-19 Thread Michal Hocko
Are there any more comments here? It seems the initial reaction wasn't all that bad and so I would like to post this with RFC dropped. On Fri 08-12-17 17:15:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 07-12-17 15:34:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 07-12-17 22:10:47, Zi Yan wrote: > [...] > > > I agree

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm: unclutter THP migration

2017-12-19 Thread Michal Hocko
Are there any more comments here? It seems the initial reaction wasn't all that bad and so I would like to post this with RFC dropped. On Fri 08-12-17 17:15:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 07-12-17 15:34:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 07-12-17 22:10:47, Zi Yan wrote: > [...] > > > I agree

[RFC PATCH 0/3] mm: unclutter THP migration

2017-12-08 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 07-12-17 15:34:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 07-12-17 22:10:47, Zi Yan wrote: [...] > > I agree with you that we should try to migrate all tail pages if the THP > > needs to be split. But this might not be compatible with "getting > > migration results" in unmap_and_move(), since a

[RFC PATCH 0/3] mm: unclutter THP migration

2017-12-08 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 07-12-17 15:34:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 07-12-17 22:10:47, Zi Yan wrote: [...] > > I agree with you that we should try to migrate all tail pages if the THP > > needs to be split. But this might not be compatible with "getting > > migration results" in unmap_and_move(), since a