Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-11-01 Thread Babu Moger
On 11/1/2016 8:20 AM, Don Zickus wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:30:59PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-11-01 Thread Babu Moger
On 11/1/2016 8:20 AM, Don Zickus wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:30:59PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-11-01 Thread Don Zickus
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:30:59PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: > > On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > >>This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > >>kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-11-01 Thread Don Zickus
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:30:59PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: > > On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > >>This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > >>kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Babu Moger
On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Babu Moger
On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Babu Moger
On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Babu Moger
On 10/31/2016 4:00 PM, Don Zickus wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific.

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. > Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some > architectures don't use

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-31 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. > Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some > architectures don't use

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-27 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. > Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some > architectures don't use

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-27 Thread Don Zickus
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:02:19AM -0700, Babu Moger wrote: > This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, > kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. > Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some > architectures don't use

[RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-26 Thread Babu Moger
This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some architectures don't use hardlockup detectors. They use their own watchdog detectors. To make both

[RFC PATCH 0/4] Clean up watchdog handlers

2016-10-26 Thread Babu Moger
This is an attempt to cleanup watchdog handlers. Right now, kernel/watchdog.c implements both softlockup and hardlockup detectors. Softlockup code is generic. Hardlockup code is arch specific. Some architectures don't use hardlockup detectors. They use their own watchdog detectors. To make both