On 28.7.2017 20:39, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:32:23 +0200
> Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> this is the initial version before next step which is move
>> uart_register_driver to probe function.
>> I was able to get rid of static array with
On 28.7.2017 20:39, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:32:23 +0200
> Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> this is the initial version before next step which is move
>> uart_register_driver to probe function.
>> I was able to get rid of static array with uart_port structures.
>> It was
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:32:23 +0200
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> this is the initial version before next step which is move
> uart_register_driver to probe function.
> I was able to get rid of static array with uart_port structures.
> It was wired with console
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:32:23 +0200
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> this is the initial version before next step which is move
> uart_register_driver to probe function.
> I was able to get rid of static array with uart_port structures.
> It was wired with console which is also fixed.
> And
Hi Alan,
this is the initial version before next step which is move
uart_register_driver to probe function.
I was able to get rid of static array with uart_port structures.
It was wired with console which is also fixed.
And the next step is the most complicated one handle .nr in uart_driver
Hi Alan,
this is the initial version before next step which is move
uart_register_driver to probe function.
I was able to get rid of static array with uart_port structures.
It was wired with console which is also fixed.
And the next step is the most complicated one handle .nr in uart_driver
6 matches
Mail list logo