On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Linus,
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by
> >> GPIO chip
Hello Linus,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>
>> So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by
>> GPIO chip controllers and consist of the following patches:
>
> Overall I like this.
>
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by
> GPIO chip controllers and consist of the following patches:
Overall I like this.
However I don't want to see any transitional phase. I prefer a BIG
fat patch
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by
GPIO chip controllers and consist of the following patches:
Overall I like this.
However I don't want to see any transitional phase.
Hello Linus,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
So this is an RFC patch-set to add a virtual table to be used by
GPIO chip controllers and consist of
On Tuesday 22 April 2014, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello Linus,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
So this is an RFC patch-set to add a
Hello Andy,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> >
>> > "Since having the operations" maybe?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, since I'm not a native english speaker I
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >
> > "Since having the operations" maybe?
> >
>
> Yes, since I'm not a native english speaker I sometimes miss some obvious
> grammatical errors. I'll fix those when posting
Hello Alexandre,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> wrote:
>> In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
>> oriented code in C. You can either embedded a set of
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
> oriented code in C. You can either embedded a set of function pointers
s/embedded/embed
> in a struct along with other members or have a separate virtual
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
oriented code in C. You can either embedded a set of function pointers
s/embedded/embed
in a struct along with other members or
Hello Alexandre,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
oriented code in C. You can
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Since having the operations maybe?
Yes, since I'm not a native english speaker I sometimes miss some obvious
grammatical errors. I'll fix those when posting the final
Hello Andy,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:34 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 04/10/2014 09:36 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Since having the operations maybe?
Yes, since I'm not a native
In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
oriented code in C. You can either embedded a set of function pointers
in a struct along with other members or have a separate virtual function
table (vtable) structure that hold all the functions and only store a
pointer to that
In the kernel there are basically two patterns to implement object
oriented code in C. You can either embedded a set of function pointers
in a struct along with other members or have a separate virtual function
table (vtable) structure that hold all the functions and only store a
pointer to that
16 matches
Mail list logo