* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:39 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > the part i know is broken is lapic broadcast, so i'd like to fix that
> > up too. trouble is, it's broken on vanilla too, so i'm not 100% sure
> > what i'm debugging yet.
>
> You need to
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:39 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Yes, that's part of why I did some of the cleanups that way, so that we
> > > could merge the two together later.
> >
> > I'd prefer to get this done now. If we plug it in as is, the "merge
> > later" probably will never happen.
>
>
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > > This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
> > > > and then
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
> > > and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
> > >
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 22:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Have you checked, if we could share the code between i386 and x86_64 at
> > least for PIT and HPET. I'm not sure about the local APIC, but I think
> > it might be doable as well.
>
> Not for PIT. I don't want all the broken ancient hardware
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 22:53 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Have you checked, if we could share the code between i386 and x86_64 at
least for PIT and HPET. I'm not sure about the local APIC, but I think
it might be doable as well.
Not for PIT. I don't want all the broken ancient hardware
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
the way.
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks.
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:39 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
Yes, that's part of why I did some of the cleanups that way, so that we
could merge the two together later.
I'd prefer to get this done now. If we plug it in as is, the merge
later probably will never happen.
that's fine, this
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:39 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
the part i know is broken is lapic broadcast, so i'd like to fix that
up too. trouble is, it's broken on vanilla too, so i'm not 100% sure
what i'm debugging yet.
You need to remove
> Have you checked, if we could share the code between i386 and x86_64 at
> least for PIT and HPET. I'm not sure about the local APIC, but I think
> it might be doable as well.
Not for PIT. I don't want all the broken ancient hardware workarounds on x86-64.
HPET might be doable, but would need
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
> > and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
> > the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
> and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
> the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
> still needs work, there's still some cruft in
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
still needs work, there's still some cruft in
* Thomas Gleixner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
Have you checked, if we could share the code between i386 and x86_64 at
least for PIT and HPET. I'm not sure about the local APIC, but I think
it might be doable as well.
Not for PIT. I don't want all the broken ancient hardware workarounds on x86-64.
HPET might be doable, but would need
* Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hm, neat - did you take a look at the x86_64 clockevents code that
> > is in -rt and that has been there for a year or so and has been
> > tested quite extensively?
>
> Yes, that's what I started with. [...]
ok :)
> [...] It was only partially
* Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers and then
> > enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along the way. The
> > lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it still needs
* Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers and then
> enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along the way. The
> lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it still needs work,
> there's still some cruft in
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
still needs work, there's still some cruft in lapic_setup_timer.
This is just for comments at this point, now
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
still needs work, there's still some cruft in lapic_setup_timer.
This is just for comments at this point, now
* Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers and then
enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along the way. The
lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it still needs work,
there's still some cruft in lapic_setup_timer.
* Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers and then
enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along the way. The
lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it still needs work,
* Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, neat - did you take a look at the x86_64 clockevents code that
is in -rt and that has been there for a year or so and has been
tested quite extensively?
Yes, that's what I started with. [...]
ok :)
[...] It was only partially done, for
24 matches
Mail list logo