On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:04:25PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 02:28 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> > On the kernel without the patch set the dummy-RTC timer interrupt received
> > 30876 interrupts in a 30s period which is within measurement uncertainty of
> > the expected 30*1024 =
On 07/18/2013 02:28 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> The kernel without the patch set has the "Using epoch 2000" line and
> the kernel with the patch set is missing the "Using epoch 2000" line.
Ah hah. You appear to be missing CONFIG_RTC_DRV_ALPHA in the new kernel, so
you have no support for the RTC at
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 06:38:14AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 06:14 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> > Tested the patch series applied against 3.10.1 on a 3-CPU ES45. System came
> > up fine but I noticed date was wrong and had been reset back to the start
> > of the epoch (Jan 1 197
On 07/17/2013 06:14 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> Tested the patch series applied against 3.10.1 on a 3-CPU ES45. System came
> up fine but I noticed date was wrong and had been reset back to the start
> of the epoch (Jan 1 1970). Appears it is not reading hardware clock
> correctly on boot.
Please
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:34:08AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The series seems pretty stable under QEMU, but I have no real hardware
> on which to test -- the whole reason I'm interested in QEMU of course.
> So I'm hoping that someone will notice this and help me out with testing.
Tested th
While there are 3 patches in this series that are specifically related
to QEMU, there are 3 more that significantly re-architect generic parts
of arch/alpha that hopefully bring them more into line with current
linux-kernel design, and 2 more that seem like they ought to work
generically, but ought
6 matches
Mail list logo
