Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
>>> This patch series introduces system management mode support.
>>
>> Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
>> usage case inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
>
>
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
usage case inside guest requires SMM?
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-05-19:
>
>
> On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
>>> This patch series introduces system management mode support.
>>
>> Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
>> usage case inside guest requires
On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
>> This patch series introduces system management mode support.
>
> Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
> usage case inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
SMM provides the trusted base
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
> This patch series introduces system management mode support.
Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any usage case
inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
> There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
> guest
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-05-19:
On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
usage case inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
On 19/05/2015 16:25, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any
usage case inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
SMM provides the trusted base for
Paolo Bonzini wrote on 2015-04-30:
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
Just curious what's motivation to add vSMM supporting? Is there any usage case
inside guest requires SMM? Thanks.
There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
guest support,
2015-05-06 13:18+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 05/05/2015 20:40, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > - Whole SMRAM is writeable. Spec says that parts of state should be
> > read-only. (This seems hard to fix without trapping all writes.)
>
> Read-only here just means that you shouldn't touch it. It says
On 05/05/2015 20:40, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> - Whole SMRAM is writeable. Spec says that parts of state should be
> read-only. (This seems hard to fix without trapping all writes.)
Read-only here just means that you shouldn't touch it. It says "Some
register images are read-only, and must not
On 05/05/2015 20:40, Radim Krčmář wrote:
- Whole SMRAM is writeable. Spec says that parts of state should be
read-only. (This seems hard to fix without trapping all writes.)
Read-only here just means that you shouldn't touch it. It says Some
register images are read-only, and must not be
2015-05-06 13:18+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
On 05/05/2015 20:40, Radim Krčmář wrote:
- Whole SMRAM is writeable. Spec says that parts of state should be
read-only. (This seems hard to fix without trapping all writes.)
Read-only here just means that you shouldn't touch it. It says Some
2015-04-30 13:35+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> This patch series introduces system management mode support.
> There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
> guest support, test on AMD, disable the capability if !unrestricted
> guest and !emulate invalid guest state(*), test with a
2015-04-30 13:35+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
guest support, test on AMD, disable the capability if !unrestricted
guest and !emulate invalid guest state(*), test with a QEMU
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
guest support, test on AMD, disable the capability if !unrestricted
guest and !emulate invalid guest state(*), test with a QEMU that
understand KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM, actually
This patch series introduces system management mode support.
There is still some work to do, namely: test without unrestricted
guest support, test on AMD, disable the capability if !unrestricted
guest and !emulate invalid guest state(*), test with a QEMU that
understand KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM, actually
16 matches
Mail list logo
