From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:14:33 +0100
> I asked you about this in private mail in August 2015, you told me to
> bring this on the list. I did it (with these patches) in February
> 2016. After two pings and months of waiting for a reply
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:14:33 +0100
> I asked you about this in private mail in August 2015, you told me to
> bring this on the list. I did it (with these patches) in February
> 2016. After two pings and months of waiting for a reply all I get is
> is a quick
On Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:39:57 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:15:16 +0100
>
> > On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:39:57 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:15:16 +0100
>
> > On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> >> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
> >>
>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:39:57AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> They are not a maintainence burdon, I rarely get more than 1 patch
> each merge window and most of the time those are cleanups or for the
> handling of a kernel wide API change rather than bug fixes.
They are a major maintainence
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:39:57AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> They are not a maintainence burdon, I rarely get more than 1 patch
> each merge window and most of the time those are cleanups or for the
> handling of a kernel wide API change rather than bug fixes.
They are a major maintainence
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:15:16 +0100
> On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
>>
>> > Ping.. since there was
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 17:15:16 +0100
> On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
>>
>> > Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
>>
On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
>
> > Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
> > this can be put into -next for some wider
On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:23:08 AM David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
>
> > Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
> > this can be put into -next for some wider exposure..
>
> I'm not going to
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
> Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
> this can be put into -next for some wider exposure..
I'm not going to apply this and break things on people, sorry.
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 14:42:12 +0100
> Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
> this can be put into -next for some wider exposure..
I'm not going to apply this and break things on people, sorry.
Hi,
On Friday, July 08, 2016 07:07:46 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> What is your opinion on this patchset?
Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
this can be put into -next for some wider exposure..
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej
Hi,
On Friday, July 08, 2016 07:07:46 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> What is your opinion on this patchset?
Ping.. since there was no negative (or any other) feedback I think that
this can be put into -next for some wider exposure..
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej
Hi Dave,
What is your opinion on this patchset?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 02:43:57 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IDE subsystem has been deprecated since 2009 and the majority
> (if
Hi Dave,
What is your opinion on this patchset?
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
On Thursday, February 04, 2016 02:43:57 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IDE subsystem has been deprecated since 2009 and the majority
> (if
Hi,
IDE subsystem has been deprecated since 2009 and the majority
(if not all) of Linux distributions have switched to use
libata for ATA support exclusively.
This patchset removes IDE host drivers that:
- have been replaced by their corresponding libata PATA host
drivers (which have been
Hi,
IDE subsystem has been deprecated since 2009 and the majority
(if not all) of Linux distributions have switched to use
libata for ATA support exclusively.
This patchset removes IDE host drivers that:
- have been replaced by their corresponding libata PATA host
drivers (which have been
18 matches
Mail list logo