Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:06:18PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > Hi, > > > In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure > if it should be a standalone patch: Could you resend it? It seems, the format is broken: yury@yury-N73SV:~/work/toolchain/glibc$ git am

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:06:18PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > Hi, > > > In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure > if it should be a standalone patch: Could you resend it? It seems, the format is broken: yury@yury-N73SV:~/work/toolchain/glibc$ git am

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:06:18PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > Hi, > > > In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure > if it should be a standalone patch: Thank you, I'll take it. > > From 1d51ca34034ef83ea602874a93e26fd158ddd214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From:

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:06:18PM +0800, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote: > Hi, > > > In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure > if it should be a standalone patch: Thank you, I'll take it. > > From 1d51ca34034ef83ea602874a93e26fd158ddd214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From:

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On 21/06/16 06:06, Yury Norov wrote: > This series enables aarch64 port with ilp32 mode. > > After long discussions in kernel list, we finally got > consensus on how ABI should look. This patchset adds > support for the ABI in GLIBC. It is tested with LTP > with no big regressions comparing to

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On 21/06/16 06:06, Yury Norov wrote: > This series enables aarch64 port with ilp32 mode. > > After long discussions in kernel list, we finally got > consensus on how ABI should look. This patchset adds > support for the ABI in GLIBC. It is tested with LTP > with no big regressions comparing to

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

Hi, In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure if it should be a standalone patch: From 1d51ca34034ef83ea602874a93e26fd158ddd214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jun Ji Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:20:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] fix for makecontext error

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

Hi, In our test, we need to fix stack pointer in makecontext. Not sure if it should be a standalone patch: From 1d51ca34034ef83ea602874a93e26fd158ddd214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jun Ji Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:20:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] fix for makecontext error Signed-off-by: Jun

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote: > Please review it. Any comments appreciated. General comments: Please make sure you go through all the review comments from the previous patch series posted in Oct 2014 and either address them, or explicitly justify why you think they are incorrect or

Re: [RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote: > Please review it. Any comments appreciated. General comments: Please make sure you go through all the review comments from the previous patch series posted in Oct 2014 and either address them, or explicitly justify why you think they are incorrect or

[RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

This series enables aarch64 port with ilp32 mode. After long discussions in kernel list, we finally got consensus on how ABI should look. This patchset adds support for the ABI in GLIBC. It is tested with LTP with no big regressions comparing to LP64 and AARCH32. Though it's very raw. Please be

[RFC PATCH 00/27] ARM64: support ILP32

This series enables aarch64 port with ilp32 mode. After long discussions in kernel list, we finally got consensus on how ABI should look. This patchset adds support for the ABI in GLIBC. It is tested with LTP with no big regressions comparing to LP64 and AARCH32. Though it's very raw. Please be