Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-06 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, Stephen and Pawel, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > I think that the above can describe that, but I'd like to see a binding > document so we can consider it in more detail. Find below another proposal. It

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-06 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, Stephen and Pawel, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: cut I think that the above can describe that, but I'd like to see a binding document so we can consider it in more detail. Find below another proposal. It

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> Mark, Pawel and Stephen, >> >> >> On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100,

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > >>> Hello Mark, Hi, sorry for the

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, Hi, sorry for the delay.

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 29-08-2013 19:19, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, > > > > I believe now we need to align

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Wei Ni
On 08/30/2013 07:19 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > * PGP Signed: 08/29/2013 at 04:19:46 PM > > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Wei Ni
On 08/30/2013 07:19 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: * PGP Signed: 08/29/2013 at 04:19:46 PM Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, cut

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 29-08-2013 19:19, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, cut I believe now we need to align on thermal

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-29 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> Hello Mark, I believe now we need to align on thermal bindings, before I propose next version of this

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-29 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, cut I believe now we need to align on thermal bindings, before I propose next version of this series.

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> Hello Mark, >> >> >> First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of >> detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go >> inline. Please let me

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello Mark, > > > First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of > detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go > inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Mark, First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more confusing :-) On 27-08-2013 06:22, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat,

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:15:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > In order to be able to build thermal policies > based on generic sensors, like I2C device, that > can be places in different points on different boards, > there is a need to have a way to feed board dependent > data into the

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:15:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: In order to be able to build thermal policies based on generic sensors, like I2C device, that can be places in different points on different boards, there is a need to have a way to feed board dependent data into the

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Mark, First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more confusing :-) On 27-08-2013 06:22, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi, On Sat, Aug

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go inline. Please let me know if I

[RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-23 Thread Eduardo Valentin
In order to be able to build thermal policies based on generic sensors, like I2C device, that can be places in different points on different boards, there is a need to have a way to feed board dependent data into the thermal framework. This patch introduces a thermal data parser for device tree.

[RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-23 Thread Eduardo Valentin
In order to be able to build thermal policies based on generic sensors, like I2C device, that can be places in different points on different boards, there is a need to have a way to feed board dependent data into the thermal framework. This patch introduces a thermal data parser for device tree.