On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 12:04 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi Tixy,
>
> Could you have a look at my code stealing patch below? Since it is
> basically a trimmed version of one of your patches I would prefer to
> put you as author and have your SOB on it. What is your opinion?
Yes, I can agree
Hi Tixy,
Could you have a look at my code stealing patch below? Since it is
basically a trimmed version of one of your patches I would prefer to
put you as author and have your SOB on it. What is your opinion?
Thanks,
Morten
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:32:21PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>
On 10 October 2012 15:47, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:49:32AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > This patch is reuse of a patch by Jon Medhurst with a
>> > few bits left out.
>>
>> Then probably he must be the author of this commit? Also a SOB is required
>> from him here.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:49:32AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 September 2012 00:02, wrote:
> > From: Morten Rasmussen
> >
> > We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
> > HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary to support multiple
> > devices with
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:49:32AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 22 September 2012 00:02, morten.rasmus...@arm.com wrote:
From: Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com
We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel
On 10 October 2012 15:47, Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 07:49:32AM +0100, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch is reuse of a patch by Jon Medhurst t...@linaro.org with a
few bits left out.
Then probably he must be the author of this commit? Also a SOB
Hi Tixy,
Could you have a look at my code stealing patch below? Since it is
basically a trimmed version of one of your patches I would prefer to
put you as author and have your SOB on it. What is your opinion?
Thanks,
Morten
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:32:21PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 12:04 +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
Hi Tixy,
Could you have a look at my code stealing patch below? Since it is
basically a trimmed version of one of your patches I would prefer to
put you as author and have your SOB on it. What is your opinion?
Yes, I can agree with
On 22 September 2012 00:02, wrote:
> From: Morten Rasmussen
>
> We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
> HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary to support multiple
> devices with different CPU topology. E.g. TC2 (ARM's Test-Chip-2
> big.LITTLE system),
On 22 September 2012 00:02, morten.rasmus...@arm.com wrote:
From: Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com
We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary to support multiple
devices with different CPU topology. E.g.
From: Morten Rasmussen
We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary to support multiple
devices with different CPU topology. E.g. TC2 (ARM's Test-Chip-2
big.LITTLE system), Fast Models, or even non big.LITTLE devices.
From: Morten Rasmussen morten.rasmus...@arm.com
We can't rely on Kconfig options to set the fast and slow CPU lists for
HMP scheduling if we want a single kernel binary to support multiple
devices with different CPU topology. E.g. TC2 (ARM's Test-Chip-2
big.LITTLE system), Fast Models, or even
12 matches
Mail list logo
