* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> - On Sep 29, 2020, at 4:13 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>>
So we have a bootstrap issue here that needs to be solved, I think.
>>>
>>> The one thing I'm not sure about is whether the vDSO interface is indeed
>>> superior
- On Sep 29, 2020, at 4:13 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
>>> So we have a bootstrap issue here that needs to be solved, I think.
>>
>> The one thing I'm not sure about is whether the vDSO interface is indeed
>> superior to KTLS, or if it is just the
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:14 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
> > Upstreaming efforts aiming to integrate rseq support into glibc led to
> > interesting discussions, where we identified a clear need to extend the
> > size of the per-thread structure shared between kernel and
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
>> So we have a bootstrap issue here that needs to be solved, I think.
>
> The one thing I'm not sure about is whether the vDSO interface is indeed
> superior to KTLS, or if it is just the model we are used to.
>
> AFAIU, the current use-cases for vDSO is that an application
- On Sep 28, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
>> Upstreaming efforts aiming to integrate rseq support into glibc led to
>> interesting discussions, where we identified a clear need to extend the
>> size of the per-thread structure shared
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> Upstreaming efforts aiming to integrate rseq support into glibc led to
> interesting discussions, where we identified a clear need to extend the
> size of the per-thread structure shared between kernel and user-space
> (struct rseq). This is something that is not possible
Upstreaming efforts aiming to integrate rseq support into glibc led to
interesting discussions, where we identified a clear need to extend the
size of the per-thread structure shared between kernel and user-space
(struct rseq). This is something that is not possible with the current
rseq ABI.
7 matches
Mail list logo