Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you do pull this patch in, I would like to get a sign-off-by from > Dipankar and give him credit, since I think he was the original > author. I just pulled it out of the -rt branch. you can preserve authorship by sending with a patch metadata

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 09:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these > > > changes from the -rt kernel. > > > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these > > changes from the -rt kernel. > > > > For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these > changes from the -rt kernel. > > For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a > tasklet. I was under the imporession we had merged this a

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these changes from the -rt kernel. For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a tasklet. I was under the imporession we had merged this a while ago

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these changes from the -rt kernel. For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a tasklet. I

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 09:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these changes from the -rt kernel. For better

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-22 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you do pull this patch in, I would like to get a sign-off-by from Dipankar and give him credit, since I think he was the original author. I just pulled it out of the -rt branch. you can preserve authorship by sending with a patch metadata that

[RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these changes from the -rt kernel. For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a tasklet. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2.6-test/include/linux/interrupt.h

[RFC PATCH 1/6] Convert the RCU tasklet into a softirq

2007-06-21 Thread Steven Rostedt
I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these changes from the -rt kernel. For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a tasklet. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6-test/include/linux/interrupt.h