On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:35:18 +1030
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Aaron Tomlin writes:
> > By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
> > and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
> > reason not to
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:35:18 +1030
Rusty Russell wrote:
> Aaron Tomlin writes:
> > By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
> > and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
> > reason not to extend this to modules which are going away
Aaron Tomlin writes:
> By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
> and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
> reason not to extend this to modules which are going away too.
Well, it depends on all the callers (ie.
Aaron Tomlin writes:
> By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
> and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
> reason not to extend this to modules which are going away too.
Well, it depends on all the callers (ie. ftrace): is that also
By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
reason not to extend this to modules which are going away too.
This patch makes both set_all_modules_text_rw() and
set_all_modules_text_ro() skip modules
By default, during the access permission modification of a module's core
and init pages, we only ignore modules that are malformed. There is no
reason not to extend this to modules which are going away too.
This patch makes both set_all_modules_text_rw() and
set_all_modules_text_ro() skip modules
6 matches
Mail list logo