Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-21 Thread Josef Sipek
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:23:30PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > (replying from a different ID as you didn't copy me on reply) > > On 6/20/07, Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > > >> +/* > >> + * When propagating mount events to

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-21 Thread Josef Sipek
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:23:30PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: (replying from a different ID as you didn't copy me on reply) On 6/20/07, Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: +/* + * When propagating mount events to peer group, this

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-20 Thread Bharata B Rao
(replying from a different ID as you didn't copy me on reply) On 6/20/07, Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > +/* > + * When propagating mount events to peer group, this is called under > + * vfsmount_lock. Hence using GFP_ATOMIC for

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-20 Thread Jan Blunck
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > +/* > + * When propagating mount events to peer group, this is called under > + * vfsmount_lock. Hence using GFP_ATOMIC for kmalloc here. > + * TODO: Can we use a separate kmem cache for union_mount ? > + */ > +struct union_mount

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-20 Thread Jan Blunck
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: +/* + * When propagating mount events to peer group, this is called under + * vfsmount_lock. Hence using GFP_ATOMIC for kmalloc here. + * TODO: Can we use a separate kmem cache for union_mount ? + */ +struct union_mount

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-20 Thread Bharata B Rao
(replying from a different ID as you didn't copy me on reply) On 6/20/07, Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:22:41 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: +/* + * When propagating mount events to peer group, this is called under + * vfsmount_lock. Hence using GFP_ATOMIC for

[RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-19 Thread Bharata B Rao
From: Bharata B Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Mount changes to support union mount. Adds union mount support. This patch adds a new mount type for union mount (MNT_UNION) and changes the mount path to build a union stack during mount. The routines for supporting the creation, traversal and

[RFC PATCH 2/4] Mount changes to support union mount.

2007-06-19 Thread Bharata B Rao
From: Bharata B Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mount changes to support union mount. Adds union mount support. This patch adds a new mount type for union mount (MNT_UNION) and changes the mount path to build a union stack during mount. The routines for supporting the creation, traversal and