On 04/17/2015 10:11 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 04/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file
On 04/17/2015 10:11 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 04/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
On 04/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On 04/16/2015 11:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:58PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Meh. Just use fallocate for any new code..
I don't have the complete
>
> Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
> also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:58PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
> also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Meh. Just use fallocate for any new code..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz mike.krav...@oracle.com
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:58PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Meh. Just use fallocate for any new code..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On 04/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz mike.krav...@oracle.com
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file
On 04/16/2015 11:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:58PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Meh. Just use fallocate for any new code..
I don't have the complete
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index
Now that we have hole punching support for hugetlbfs, we can
also support the MADV_REMOVE interface to it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen dave.han...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz mike.krav...@oracle.com
---
mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
12 matches
Mail list logo