On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> What other layer? /sys/devices/platform/e820_pmem is that exact same
>> device we had before this patch. We just have a proper driver for it
>> now.
>
> We're adding
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> What other layer? /sys/devices/platform/e820_pmem is that exact same
> device we had before this patch. We just have a proper driver for it
> now.
We're adding another layer of indirection between the old e820 file
and the new
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
What other layer? /sys/devices/platform/e820_pmem is that exact same
device we had before this patch. We just have a proper driver for it
now.
We're adding
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:04:02AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
What other layer? /sys/devices/platform/e820_pmem is that exact same
device we had before this patch. We just have a proper driver for it
now.
We're adding another layer of indirection between the old e820 file
and the new module.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> I'm not grokking the argument against allowing this functionality to
>> be modular.
>
> You're adding a another layer of platform_devices just to make a tivially
> small
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> I'm not grokking the argument against allowing this functionality to
> be modular.
You're adding a another layer of platform_devices just to make a tivially
small piece of code modular so that you can hook into it. I don't think
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:29PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
>> alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
>> The unit test mocking
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:29PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
> alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
> The unit test mocking implementation requires that libnvdimm be a module
> and not
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:29PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
The unit test mocking implementation requires that libnvdimm be a module
and not built-in.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50:29PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
The unit test
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm not grokking the argument against allowing this functionality to
be modular.
You're adding a another layer of platform_devices just to make a tivially
small
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:28:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm not grokking the argument against allowing this functionality to
be modular.
You're adding a another layer of platform_devices just to make a tivially
small piece of code modular so that you can hook into it. I don't think
Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
The unit test mocking implementation requires that libnvdimm be a module
and not built-in.
A nice side effect is the implementation is a bit more generic
Purely for ease of testing, with this in place we can run the unit test
alongside any tests that depend on the memmap=ss!nn kernel parameter.
The unit test mocking implementation requires that libnvdimm be a module
and not built-in.
A nice side effect is the implementation is a bit more generic
14 matches
Mail list logo
