On Friday 22 June 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
> It creates a "work_tasklet". When configured to use work_tasklets
> instead of tasklets, instead of creating tasklets, a work queue
> is made in its place. The API is still the
On Friday 22 June 2007, Steven Rostedt wrote:
This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
It creates a work_tasklet. When configured to use work_tasklets
instead of tasklets, instead of creating tasklets, a work queue
is made in its place. The API is still the same, and
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 19:52 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > truct tasklet_struct, work);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (unlikely(atomic_read(>count))) {
> > > > + pr_debug("tasklet disabled %s %p\n", t->n, t);
> > > > +
On 06/22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > truct tasklet_struct, work);
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(atomic_read(>count))) {
> > > + pr_debug("tasklet disabled %s %p\n", t->n, t);
> > > + set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING, >state);
> > > + smp_mb();
> > > + /* make sure we
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:06 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > +void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> > +{
> > + BUG_ON(!ktaskletd_wq);
> > + pr_debug("scheduling tasklet %s %p\n", t->n, t);
>
> I'd change these pr_debug lines to "tasklet : scheduling %s %p\n" for
> readability ..
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment (tasklets-to-workqueues.patch)
> This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
> It creates a "work_tasklet". When configured to use work_tasklets
> instead of tasklets, instead of
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
plain text document attachment (tasklets-to-workqueues.patch)
This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
It creates a work_tasklet. When configured to use work_tasklets
instead of tasklets, instead of creating
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:06 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
+void tasklet_schedule(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ BUG_ON(!ktaskletd_wq);
+ pr_debug(scheduling tasklet %s %p\n, t-n, t);
I'd change these pr_debug lines to tasklet : scheduling %s %p\n for
readability ..
As Ingo
On 06/22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
truct tasklet_struct, work);
+
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(t-count))) {
+ pr_debug(tasklet disabled %s %p\n, t-n, t);
+ set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING, t-state);
+ smp_mb();
+ /* make sure we were not just enabled
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 19:52 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 06/22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
truct tasklet_struct, work);
+
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(t-count))) {
+ pr_debug(tasklet disabled %s %p\n, t-n, t);
+ set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_PENDING,
This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
It creates a "work_tasklet". When configured to use work_tasklets
instead of tasklets, instead of creating tasklets, a work queue
is made in its place. The API is still the same, and the drivers
don't know that a work queue is
This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
It creates a work_tasklet. When configured to use work_tasklets
instead of tasklets, instead of creating tasklets, a work queue
is made in its place. The API is still the same, and the drivers
don't know that a work queue is being
12 matches
Mail list logo
