Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:05:36 +0200 (EET) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > vmlinux.o: > > > 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andi Kleen
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It should be possible to use a modular jhash.ko. The things which you > have identified as clients of the jhash library are usually loaded as modules. For very small functions like this own modules are quite expensive. First everything gets rounded

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > vmlinux.o: > > 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 > > > > ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: > > jhash_3words: 112 > > jhash2: 276 > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > vmlinux.o: > 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 > > ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: > jhash_3words: 112 > jhash2: 276 > jhash: 475 > > select for networking code might need a more

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vmlinux.o: 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: jhash_3words: 112 jhash2: 276 jhash: 475 select for networking code might need a more fine-grained

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vmlinux.o: 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: jhash_3words: 112 jhash2: 276 jhash: 475

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andi Kleen
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It should be possible to use a modular jhash.ko. The things which you have identified as clients of the jhash library are usually loaded as modules. For very small functions like this own modules are quite expensive. First everything gets rounded up

Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:05:36 +0200 (EET) Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:18 +0200 Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vmlinux.o: 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869

[RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-20 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
vmlinux.o: 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: jhash_3words: 112 jhash2: 276 jhash: 475 select for networking code might need a more fine-grained approach. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

[RFC PATCH 8/8] Jhash in too big for inlining, move under lib/

2008-02-20 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
vmlinux.o: 62 functions changed, 66 bytes added, 10935 bytes removed, diff: -10869 ...+ these to lib/jhash.o: jhash_3words: 112 jhash2: 276 jhash: 475 select for networking code might need a more fine-grained approach. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---