On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:44:30AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> Update __read_32bit_c0_register() and __read_32bit_c0_ctrl_register() to
> use "unsigned int res;" instead of "int res;". There is little reason to
> treat these register values as signed. They are either counters (which
> by
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:44:30AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Update __read_32bit_c0_register() and __read_32bit_c0_ctrl_register() to
use unsigned int res; instead of int res;. There is little reason to
treat these register values as signed. They are either counters (which
by definition are
Update __read_32bit_c0_register() and __read_32bit_c0_ctrl_register() to
use "unsigned int res;" instead of "int res;". There is little reason to
treat these register values as signed. They are either counters (which
by definition are unsigned) or are made up of various bit fields to be
Update __read_32bit_c0_register() and __read_32bit_c0_ctrl_register() to
use unsigned int res; instead of int res;. There is little reason to
treat these register values as signed. They are either counters (which
by definition are unsigned) or are made up of various bit fields to be
interpreted as
4 matches
Mail list logo
