Am 12.11.20 um 04:42 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 11/11/20 7:36 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am 03.10.20 um 12:11 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Am 02.10.20 um 19:51 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> […]
I'm preparing to send v2 and was a bit unhappy with this and
On 11/11/20 7:36 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am 03.10.20 um 12:11 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
>> Am 02.10.20 um 19:51 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>>> On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
= RFC =
Am I asking for too much from users by telling them to test mainline? But
most
Am 03.10.20 um 12:11 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Am 02.10.20 um 19:51 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
= RFC =
Am I asking for too much from users by telling them to test mainline? But most
will likely have an outdated and heavily patched vendor kernel anyway,
Many thx for you comments. Consider all the obvious spelling and
grammatical mistakes you pointed out fixed, I won't mention all of them
in this reply to keep things easier to follow.
Am 02.10.20 um 19:51 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> = RFC =
>>
>> Am I as
On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Now that the document described all preparatory steps tell users to
> install the latest kernel. Try pretty hard to motivate them installing a
> mainline kernel, as that is best for reporting issues. Mention the
> latest stable kernel as an acceptable
Now that the document described all preparatory steps tell users to
install the latest kernel. Try pretty hard to motivate them installing a
mainline kernel, as that is best for reporting issues. Mention the
latest stable kernel as an acceptable alternative, but discourage this
option. Point out th
6 matches
Mail list logo
