Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi, On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: > Ah, I missed the previous version as I think it should be from > non-version to v2 rather than from non-version to v1, which IIRC is from > Doug. :) Yup, patch-numbering is 1-based, not 0-based, so typically you

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi, On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: > Ah, I missed the previous version as I think it should be from > non-version to v2 rather than from non-version to v1, which IIRC is from > Doug. :) Yup, patch-numbering is 1-based, not 0-based, so typically you have no-version => v2 => v3

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

在 2016/6/3 20:36, Heiko Stübner 写道: Hi Shawn, Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: How about merge it into your patch#3. see comments from Doug and me on previous version. clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both clock and devicetree

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

在 2016/6/3 20:36, Heiko Stübner 写道: Hi Shawn, Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: How about merge it into your patch#3. see comments from Doug and me on previous version. clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both clock and devicetree

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi Shawn, Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: > How about merge it into your patch#3. see comments from Doug and me on previous version. clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi Shawn, Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: > How about merge it into your patch#3. see comments from Doug and me on previous version. clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi Lin How about merge it into your patch#3. On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote: Signed-off-by: Lin Huang --- Changes in v1: - None include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Hi Lin How about merge it into your patch#3. On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote: Signed-off-by: Lin Huang --- Changes in v1: - None include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h

[RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Signed-off-by: Lin Huang --- Changes in v1: - None include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644 ---

[RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc

Signed-off-by: Lin Huang --- Changes in v1: - None include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644 ---