> On Feb 15, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Edward Cree wrote:
>
> On 05/02/19 08:50, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> In cases where RCU cannot be used (e.g. because some callees need to RCU
>>> synchronise), it might be possible to add a variant that uses
>>> synchronize_rcu_tasks() when updating, but this series
On 05/02/19 08:50, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> In cases where RCU cannot be used (e.g. because some callees need to RCU
>> synchronise), it might be possible to add a variant that uses
>> synchronize_rcu_tasks() when updating, but this series does not attempt this.
> I wonder why.
Mainly because I have
> On Feb 1, 2019, at 4:05 PM, Edward Cree wrote:
>
> This series introduces 'dynamic_calls', branch trees of static calls (updated
> at runtime using text patching), to avoid making indirect calls to common
> targets. The basic mechanism is
>if (func == static_key_1.target)
>
This series introduces 'dynamic_calls', branch trees of static calls (updated
at runtime using text patching), to avoid making indirect calls to common
targets. The basic mechanism is
if (func == static_key_1.target)
call_static_key_1(args);
else if (func == static_key_2.target)
4 matches
Mail list logo
