On 04/09/2014 09:44 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling
In x86 asm-speak, relative jumps and calls are called
simply "relative" (meaning that instructions contain
an offset relative to current instruction pointer).
I propose
On 04/09/2014 09:44 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling
In x86 asm-speak, relative jumps and calls are called
simply relative (meaning that instructions contain
an offset relative to current instruction pointer).
I propose to
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 21:44 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > OK. Please see the RFC changes. Obviously not for inclusion yet. And
> > totally untested, except I verified that the test-case from 4/6 works.
>
> Still not really tested, but seems to work.
>
>
On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> OK. Please see the RFC changes. Obviously not for inclusion yet. And
> totally untested, except I verified that the test-case from 4/6 works.
Still not really tested, but seems to work.
Please see v2. All changes are minor except the s/ENOSYS/-ENOSYS/ fix.
On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
OK. Please see the RFC changes. Obviously not for inclusion yet. And
totally untested, except I verified that the test-case from 4/6 works.
Still not really tested, but seems to work.
Please see v2. All changes are minor except the s/ENOSYS/-ENOSYS/ fix.
Please
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 21:44 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
OK. Please see the RFC changes. Obviously not for inclusion yet. And
totally untested, except I verified that the test-case from 4/6 works.
Still not really tested, but seems to work.
Please see v2.
6 matches
Mail list logo