Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] DMA Engine support for AM33xx

2012-10-11 Thread Matt Porter
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > Hey Matt, > > Do you know now similar are the EDMA engines on the am33xx and am389x? I've > been working on am389x upstreaming and I'll try these patches out if it is > the same engine. Hi Grant, It's the same one. am389x/ti816x

[RFC PATCH v2 00/16] DMA Engine support for AM33xx

2012-10-11 Thread Matt Porter
Changes since v1: - Rebased on top of mainline from 12250d8 - Dropped the feature removal schedule patch - Implemented dma_request_slave_channel_compat() and converted the mmc and spi drivers to use it - Dropped unneeded #address-cells and #size-cells from

[RFC PATCH v2 00/16] DMA Engine support for AM33xx

2012-10-11 Thread Matt Porter
Changes since v1: - Rebased on top of mainline from 12250d8 - Dropped the feature removal schedule patch - Implemented dma_request_slave_channel_compat() and converted the mmc and spi drivers to use it - Dropped unneeded #address-cells and #size-cells from

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] DMA Engine support for AM33xx

2012-10-11 Thread Matt Porter
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: Hey Matt, Do you know now similar are the EDMA engines on the am33xx and am389x? I've been working on am389x upstreaming and I'll try these patches out if it is the same engine. Hi Grant, It's the same one. am389x/ti816x and