RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-30 Thread Alim Akhtar
nk...@intel.com; ALIM AKHTAR > Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sang-yoon Oh > ; Sung-Jun Park > ; yongmyung lee > ; Jinyoung CHOI ; > Adel Choi ; BoRam Shin > > Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster > Supp

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-30 Thread Daejun Park
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 10:05 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > Hi Bean, > > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > > > suggestion. > > > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > > > > > Sorry! I replied to your

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-30 Thread Bean Huo
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 10:05 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > Hi Bean, > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > > suggestion. > > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > > > Sorry! I replied to your comment ( > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-30 Thread Bean Huo
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 06:39 +, Avri Altman wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Hi Bean, > > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > > > suggestion. > > > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > > > > > Sorry! I

RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-30 Thread Avri Altman
Hi, > > Hi Bean, > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > > suggestion. > > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > > > Sorry! I replied to your comment ( > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Bean, > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > suggestion. > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > Sorry! I replied to your comment ( > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Bean Huo
Hi Daejun On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 15:15 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > suggestion. > > let me provide the reason. > > Sorry! I replied to your comment ( > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/15/1492), > but you didn't reply on that. I thought

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Bean Huo
Hi Avri On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 05:24 +, Avri Altman wrote: > Hi Bean, > > > > Hi Daejun > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > suggestion. > > let me provide the reason. > > > > Before submitting your next version patch, please check your L2P > > mapping HPB

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Daejun Park
> Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my suggestion. > let me provide the reason. Sorry! I replied to your comment (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/15/1492), but you didn't reply on that. I thought you agreed because you didn't send any more comments. > Before submitting your

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Bean Huo
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 11:06 +, Avri Altman wrote: > > > > Hi Avri > > > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 05:24 +, Avri Altman wrote: > > > Hi Bean, > > > > > > > > Hi Daejun > > > > > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > > suggestion. > > > > let me provide the

RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Avri Altman
Hi Bean, > > Hi Daejun > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my suggestion. > let me provide the reason. > > Before submitting your next version patch, please check your L2P > mapping HPB reqeust submission logical algorithem. I have did > performance comparison testing on

RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Avri Altman
c...@samsung.com>; Adel Choi ; BoRam > Shin > Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Western Digital. Do not click > on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know

RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-29 Thread Avri Altman
> > Hi Avri > > On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 05:24 +, Avri Altman wrote: > > Hi Bean, > > > > > > Hi Daejun > > > > > > Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my > > > suggestion. > > > let me provide the reason. > > > > > > Before submitting your next version patch, please check

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-28 Thread Bean Huo
Hi Daejun Seems you intentionally ignored to give you comments on my suggestion. let me provide the reason. Before submitting your next version patch, please check your L2P mapping HPB reqeust submission logical algorithem. I have did performance comparison testing on 4KB, there are about 13%

[RFC PATCH v3 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support

2020-06-22 Thread Daejun Park
Changelog: v2 -> v3 1. Add checking input module parameter value. 2. Change base commit from 5.8/scsi-queue to 5.9/scsi-queue. 3. Cleanup for unused variables and label. v1 -> v2 1. Change the full boilerplate text to SPDX style. 2. Adopt dynamic allocation for sub-region data structure. 3.