On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:14:05PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Yes please, I'd be more confident if you did this than me, there's
> > already enough to worry about with the series.
>
> Given that this patchset is a security hole waiting to happen I don't
> see why Al should bother unless
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 20:14 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent writes:
>
> 2> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> >> > From: Ian Kent
> >> >
> >> > The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode
Ian Kent writes:
2> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> > From: Ian Kent
>> >
>> > The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
>> > contained execution implementation, move it to
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > From: Ian Kent
> >
> > The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
> > contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
>
> I really
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> From: Ian Kent
>
> The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
> contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
I really don't like that. AFAICS, the root of the evil is that fscking
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
From: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
I really
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 20:14 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Ian Kent ra...@themaw.net writes:
2 On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
From: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by
Ian Kent ra...@themaw.net writes:
2 On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:47 +, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
From: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
contained execution implementation, move it
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:14:05PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Yes please, I'd be more confident if you did this than me, there's
already enough to worry about with the series.
Given that this patchset is a security hole waiting to happen I don't
see why Al should bother unless there
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
From: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
I really don't like that. AFAICS, the root of the evil is that
From: Ian Kent
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent
Cc: Benjamin Coddington
Cc: Al Viro
Cc: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: David Howells
Cc: Trond Myklebust
Cc: Oleg Nesterov
From: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
The mnt_namespace definition will be needed by the usermode helper
contained execution implementation, move it to include/linux/mount.h.
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent ik...@redhat.com
Cc: Benjamin Coddington bcodd...@redhat.com
Cc: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: J.
12 matches
Mail list logo
