> On Jun 28, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>Gentle Ping:) Any suggestion about this patch?
> Thanks!
> Gerry
I'm fine with it if Dan has no objections.
>> On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
>>
Hi Dave,
Gentle Ping:) Any suggestion about this patch?
Thanks!
Gerry
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
> The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
> when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
> will only be called by dma driver
Hi Dave,
Gentle Ping:) Any suggestion about this patch?
Thanks!
Gerry
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
will only be called by dma driver exit
On Jun 28, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Jiang Liu jiang@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
Gentle Ping:) Any suggestion about this patch?
Thanks!
Gerry
I'm fine with it if Dan has no objections.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> >> Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
>> >>
>> >> On 2015/6/2 14:36,
On 2015/6/8 23:48, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
> >>
> >> On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>> The dmaengine core assumes that async
On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
>>
>> On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
>>> when they not used anymore, or it
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
>
> On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
> > when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
> >
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
will only
On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36,
On 2015/6/8 23:48, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:44:43PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/6/8 18:42, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
> The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
> when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
> will only be called by dma driver exit routines. But this assumption is
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
will only be called by dma driver exit routines. But this assumption is
not true for the IOAT driver, which calls dma_async_device_unregister()
from
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
will only be called by dma driver exit routines. But this assumption is
not true for the IOAT driver, which calls dma_async_device_unregister()
from
Ccing Rafael, it's ACPI hotplug related.
On 2015/6/2 14:36, Jiang Liu wrote:
The dmaengine core assumes that async DMA devices will only be removed
when they not used anymore, or it assumes dma_async_device_unregister()
will only be called by dma driver exit routines. But this assumption is
18 matches
Mail list logo
