> From: Joe Perches [mailto:j...@perches.com]
> > We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static, to make sure no drivers
> > can access it directly.
>
> You break the build with this patch.
>
> You can't do this until the users of the table are converted.
>
> So far, they are not.
>
> I
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 13:14 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option,
> so that we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation
> by hardware.
> We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static,
> to make sure no drivers can access it
this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option,
so that we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation
by hardware.
We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static,
to make sure no drivers can access it directly.
Change bitrev16() bitrev32() to be inline function,
don't
this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option,
so that we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation
by hardware.
We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static,
to make sure no drivers can access it directly.
Change bitrev16() bitrev32() to be inline function,
don't
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 13:14 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
this change add CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE config option,
so that we can use arm/arm64 rbit instruction to do bitrev operation
by hardware.
We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static,
to make sure no drivers can access it directly.
From: Joe Perches [mailto:j...@perches.com]
We also change byte_rev_table[] to be static, to make sure no drivers
can access it directly.
You break the build with this patch.
You can't do this until the users of the table are converted.
So far, they are not.
I submitted patches
6 matches
Mail list logo