Re: [RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP to guard irq_common_data.node

2015-05-17 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/5/16 4:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > >> NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA >> to guard irq_common_data.node. > > Please move this change to the front and do it on irq_data. That would > have avoided confusing Abel

Re: [RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP to guard irq_common_data.node

2015-05-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 4 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA > to guard irq_common_data.node. Please move this change to the front and do it on irq_data. That would have avoided confusing Abel :) Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this

[RFC v1 03/11] genirq: Use CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP to guard irq_common_data.node

2015-05-03 Thread Jiang Liu
NUMA is enabled by CONFIG_NUMA instead of CONFIG_SMP, so use CONFIG_NUMA to guard irq_common_data.node. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu --- include/linux/irq.h |4 ++-- kernel/irq/irqdesc.c |4 +++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/li