On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 01:01:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -1143,10 +1160,17 @@ static unsigned
> > virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 01:01:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -1143,10 +1160,17 @@ static unsigned
> > virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > /* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
> >
On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check
On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check
On 2018年05月08日 17:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:34:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang
On 2018年05月08日 17:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:34:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:34:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:34:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On
On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set
On 2018年05月08日 17:16, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
> > > > > event_off
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:16:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
> > > > > event_off
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
wrapped. And in this case, although new
On 2018年05月08日 14:44, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
wrapped. And in this case, although new
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
> > > event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
> > > wrapped. And in this case, although new is smaller than
>
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:40:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
> > > event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
> > > wrapped. And in this case, although new is smaller than
>
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
wrapped. And in this case, although new is smaller than
event_off (i.e. the third param -- old), new shouldn't
add vq->num, and actually we
On 2018年05月08日 11:05, Jason Wang wrote:
Because in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(), we may set an
event_off which is bigger than new and both of them have
wrapped. And in this case, although new is smaller than
event_off (i.e. the third param -- old), new shouldn't
add vq->num, and actually we
On 2018年05月03日 21:54, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:25:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
So how about we use the straightforward way then?
You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
On 2018年05月03日 21:54, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:25:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
So how about we use the straightforward way then?
You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:25:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > > So how about we use the straightforward way then?
> > > > You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
> > > > of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
> > > >
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:25:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > > So how about we use the straightforward way then?
> > > > You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
> > > > of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
> > > >
On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
So how about we use the straightforward way then?
You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
vring_need_event()?
The problem is that, the second param (new_idx) of
vring_need_event() will be
On 2018年05月03日 10:09, Tiwei Bie wrote:
So how about we use the straightforward way then?
You mean we do new += vq->vring_packed.num instead
of event_idx -= vq->vring_packed.num before calling
vring_need_event()?
The problem is that, the second param (new_idx) of
vring_need_event() will be
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:44:39AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:11:16AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:44:39AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:11:16AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:11:16AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:11:16AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:42:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > This commit introduces the event idx support in
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:51:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > > This commit introduces the event idx support in
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
> > > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
> > >
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 03:28:19PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
> > > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
> > >
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
> > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
> > implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
> > and some
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:51:06AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
> > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
> > implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
> > and some
On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check
On 2018年04月25日 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote:
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when
checking whether a
This commit introduces the event idx support in packed
ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the
implementation in this patch may not work as expected,
and some further discussions on the implementation are
needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when
checking whether a
42 matches
Mail list logo
