On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:23 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 3/4/19 3:01 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 1:38 PM Brendan Higgins
< snip >
> > Someone suggested I should send the next revision out as "PATCH"
> > instead of "RFC" since there seems to be general consensus about
On 2019-03-20 11:23 p.m., Knut Omang wrote:
> Testing drivers, hardware and firmware within production kernels was the use
> case that inspired KTF (Kernel Test Framework). Currently KTF is available as
> a
> standalone git repository. That's been the most efficient form for us so far,
> as
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 1:38 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
> framework for the Linux kernel.
>
> ## More information on KUnit
>
> There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that
> describes how to use
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:53 PM Thiago Jung Bauermann
wrote:
>
>
> Frank Rowand writes:
>
> > On 2/19/19 10:34 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:02 PM Frank Rowand
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have not read through the patches in any detail. I have read some of
> >>>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:46 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 2/19/19 10:34 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:02 PM Frank Rowand
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I have not read through the patches in any detail. I have read some of
> >> the code to try to understand the patches to
Frank Rowand writes:
> On 2/19/19 10:34 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:02 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>>> I have not read through the patches in any detail. I have read some of
>>> the code to try to understand the patches to the devicetree unit tests.
>>> So that
On 2/19/19 10:34 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:02 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
>
>> I have not read through the patches in any detail. I have read some of
>> the code to try to understand the patches to the devicetree unit tests.
>> So that may limit how valid my comments
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:02 PM Frank Rowand wrote:
> I have not read through the patches in any detail. I have read some of
> the code to try to understand the patches to the devicetree unit tests.
> So that may limit how valid my comments below are.
No problem.
>
> I found the code
On 2/14/19 1:37 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
> framework for the Linux kernel.
>
> Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework;
> it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM
This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
framework for the Linux kernel.
Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework;
it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM
and does not require tests to be written in userspace
10 matches
Mail list logo
