On 09/20/2015 03:03 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> In this case of CPU is running at fmax, it's true that
> task_fits_capacity() will return true. But here i think
> cpu_overutilized() also will return true, so that means scheduler will
> go back to use CFS's old way for loading balance. Finally tasks also
On 09/20/2015 03:03 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> In this case of CPU is running at fmax, it's true that
> task_fits_capacity() will return true. But here i think
> cpu_overutilized() also will return true, so that means scheduler will
> go back to use CFS's old way for loading balance. Finally tasks also
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:39:16AM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:34 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> Here should consider scenario for two groups have same capacity?
> >> This will benefit for the case LITTLE.LITTLE. So the code will be
> >> looks like below:
> >>
> >>int
On 09/18/2015 03:34 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> Here should consider scenario for two groups have same capacity?
>> This will benefit for the case LITTLE.LITTLE. So the code will be
>> looks like below:
>>
>> int target_sg_cpu = INT_MAX;
>>
>> if (capacity_of(max_cap_cpu) <=
On 09/18/2015 03:34 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> Here should consider scenario for two groups have same capacity?
>> This will benefit for the case LITTLE.LITTLE. So the code will be
>> looks like below:
>>
>> int target_sg_cpu = INT_MAX;
>>
>> if (capacity_of(max_cap_cpu) <=
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:39:16AM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:34 AM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> Here should consider scenario for two groups have same capacity?
> >> This will benefit for the case LITTLE.LITTLE. So the code will be
> >> looks like below:
> >>
> >>int
On 02/09/15 18:11, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
>> wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
>> system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
On 02/09/15 18:11, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
>> wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
>> system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
> wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
> system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
>
> energy_aware_wake_cpu() attempts
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
> wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
> system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
>
> energy_aware_wake_cpu() attempts
Hi Morten,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
> wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
> system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
>
>
Hi Morten,
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
energy_aware_wake_cpu()
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Sai Gurrappadi wrote:
> Hi Morten,
>
> On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > ---
>
> > +static int energy_aware_wake_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int target)
> > +{
> > + struct sched_domain *sd;
> > + struct sched_group *sg, *sg_target;
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Sai Gurrappadi wrote:
Hi Morten,
On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
---
+static int energy_aware_wake_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_group *sg, *sg_target;
+ int
Hi Morten,
On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> ---
> +static int energy_aware_wake_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int target)
> +{
> + struct sched_domain *sd;
> + struct sched_group *sg, *sg_target;
> + int target_max_cap = INT_MAX;
> + int target_cpu = task_cpu(p);
>
Hi Morten,
On 07/07/2015 11:24 AM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
---
+static int energy_aware_wake_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_group *sg, *sg_target;
+ int target_max_cap = INT_MAX;
+ int target_cpu = task_cpu(p);
+
Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
energy_aware_wake_cpu() attempts to find group of cpus with sufficient
compute capacity to accommodate the
Let available compute capacity and estimated energy impact select
wake-up target cpu when energy-aware scheduling is enabled and the
system in not over-utilized (above the tipping point).
energy_aware_wake_cpu() attempts to find group of cpus with sufficient
compute capacity to accommodate the
18 matches
Mail list logo
