On 18-10-19, 11:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 18-10-19, 10:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:27 AM Viresh Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Fri,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:24 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 18-10-19, 10:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:27 AM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar
> > > > wrote:
> > >
On 18-10-19, 10:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:27 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > [BTW, Vi
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:27 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
> > > that the new min is less than the new max, because the QoS doesn'
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
> > that the new min is less than the new max, because the QoS doesn't do
> > that.]
>
> The ->verify() callback does that f
On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
> that the new min is less than the new max, because the QoS doesn't do
> that.]
The ->verify() callback does that for us I believe.
--
viresh
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:37:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The motivation for this series is to address the problem discussed here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 06:34:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:00 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:27:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 16-10-19, 15:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the spinning these patches so quickly.
>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 12:00 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:27:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 16-10-19, 15:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Thanks for the spinning these patches so quickly.
> > >
> > > I did give it a spin, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the bug I re
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:27:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-10-19, 15:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Thanks for the spinning these patches so quickly.
> >
> > I did give it a spin, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the bug I reported.
> > So I looked at my bug report in detail and looks like
On 16-10-19, 15:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Thanks for the spinning these patches so quickly.
>
> I did give it a spin, but unfortunately it doesn't fix the bug I reported.
> So I looked at my bug report in detail and looks like the cpufreq_driver
> variable is set to NULL at that point and it fails
On 16-10-19, 12:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The motivation for this series is to address the problem discussed here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:37:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The motivation for this series is to address the problem discussed here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f5821
Hi All,
The motivation for this series is to address the problem discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5ad2624194baa2f53acc1f1e627eb7684c577a19.1562210705.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org/T/#md2d89e95906b8c91c15f582146173dce2e86e99f
and also reported here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm
15 matches
Mail list logo