Re: [Regression][v3.10][v3.11] Revert "HID: Fix logitech-dj: missing Unifying device issue"

Added Benjamin. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Andrew de los Reyes wrote: > I believe this commit was an optimization, so it should be okay to revert > it. > > Nestor, can you confirm? 5962640 is not an optimization, is a workaround for the dropped packets during enumeration. After

Re: [Regression][v3.10][v3.11] Revert HID: Fix logitech-dj: missing Unifying device issue

Added Benjamin. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Andrew de los Reyes a...@chromium.org wrote: I believe this commit was an optimization, so it should be okay to revert it. Nestor, can you confirm? 5962640 is not an optimization, is a workaround for the dropped packets during enumeration.

[Regression][v3.10][v3.11] Revert "HID: Fix logitech-dj: missing Unifying device issue"

Hi Andrew, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. It was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 8af6c08830b1ae114d1a8b548b1f8b056e068887 Author: Andrew de los Reyes Date: Mon Feb 18 09:20:23 2013 -0800 Revert "HID: Fix logitech-dj: missing Unifying

[Regression][v3.10][v3.11] Revert HID: Fix logitech-dj: missing Unifying device issue

Hi Andrew, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. It was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 8af6c08830b1ae114d1a8b548b1f8b056e068887 Author: Andrew de los Reyes a...@chromium.org Date: Mon Feb 18 09:20:23 2013 -0800 Revert HID: Fix logitech-dj: