Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Byungchul Park
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:09:45PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > > All now applied to the 3.14-stable queue, thanks. > > > > Hello, > > > > I realized this was not applied to 3.18-stable yet. > > > > Is there any reason? > > I don't maintain the 3.18-stable tree, so there's nothing I can do >

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Byungchul Park
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:09:45PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > > All now applied to the 3.14-stable queue, thanks. > > > > Hello, > > > > I realized this was not applied to 3.18-stable yet. > > > > Is there any reason? > > I don't maintain the 3.18-stable tree, so there's nothing I can do >

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > > > Upstream commits to be applied > > > == > > > > > > e3fca9e:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > > > Upstream commits to be applied > > > == > > > > > > e3fca9e:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Upstream commits to be applied > > == > > > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > > 4c9a4bc: sched:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-07-18 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Upstream commits to be applied > > == > > > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > > 4c9a4bc: sched:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-06-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:52 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-06-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:52 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-03-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-03-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt:

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 04:02 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: [...] @stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested) check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith ---  kernel/sched/fair.c |9

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 04:02 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: [...] @stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested) check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment. Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith ---  kernel/sched/fair.c |9 +  1 file

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 04:02 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: [...] > @stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested) > check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith > --- >  

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 04:02 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: [...] > @stable: Kernels that predate SCHED_DEADLINE can use this simple (and tested) > check in lieu of backport of the full 18 patch mainline treatment. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith > --- >  kernel/sched/fair.c |9 + >  1

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 11:00 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100,

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 11:00 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100,

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:00:08AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:00:08AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:41:39PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:42:12AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > So the reason I didn't

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:44:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > So the reason I didn't

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > > > trivial, however

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:08:37PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > > > trivial, however

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-15 Thread Byungchul Park
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > > trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I > > suppose

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-02-15 Thread Byungchul Park
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:25:03PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > > trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I > > suppose

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-24 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I > suppose backporting them isn't a problem. Hello, What do you think about the way to

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-24 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So the reason I didn't mark them for stable is that they were non > trivial, however they've been in for a while now and nothing broke, so I > suppose backporting them isn't a problem. Hello, What do you think about the way to

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-05 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt:

[STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-05 Thread Byungchul Park
Upstream commits to be applied == e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() fd7a4be: sched, rt: Convert

[STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-05 Thread Byungchul Park
Upstream commits to be applied == e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() fd7a4be: sched, rt: Convert

Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches

2016-01-05 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Upstream commits to be applied > == > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() > 8046d68: sched,rt: